>>7053971>The DOLLS were sold in beautiful swimsuits, or intricated fashions.You're saying that the dolls were only sold with "intricated[sic]" fashions wich[sic] included "socks; blouses; coats; shoes"? More bullshit.
Pic related. Where is her "intricated" fashion? Where is her socks? Her shoes? Coat? Blouse? Hmm... it's almost like... not all Barbie dolls were large sets back in the day! If you're going to try to wax nostalgic, make sure you know what you're talking about first.
Wait, I'm sure your response will ignore the proof in front of your face and just be something like:
>HAHAHAHAHHAA Mattel fanboy you just proved my point by proving I'm wrong "wich" is super funny XDDD so fun lololBoring.
>But honestly, BRAND FANS would buy anything getting throw at them without many critical thinking. Yet the people who have complained about every Mattel collector release this year except Women of Achievement are saying this is the first thing they've wanted to buy since 2017 and how much they love the set. Weird how other people can like something you don't like!
It's honestly strange how obsessed you are with somehow proving this set is... what? "Downgraded"? When it's not a downgrade of anything. Not authentic? When they're reproduction singles with reproduction fashions.
