>>11190239>>11190380Truthfully, I just said it because it looked too crisp and detailed and tall to be a legitimately old model (when I say tall, I mean that proportionally, it looks like a tall marine that's just crouching to me, I know the mini is pretty squat relatively speaking). When I say old, I mean stuff that looks like this, so that Beaky already looks way too clean and well-proportioned to me.
I don't think I've ever seen that mini before despite being born in the late 80s and studying every mini catalog I could get my hands on. Someone help me out here, what year is that visor beaky actually from?
