>>8825649>you're being elitist and that makes you wrong for noticing it looks like a bootleg of a bootleg of a bootlegor
>you're wrong for noticing it looks like a bootleg because a bunch of moviecasuals never knew that the bootleg of a bootleg of a bootleg existed until todayMaybe both? Either way: cool story, bro.
Also, i just rememberd that the ML figure was pretty shit.