>>7899579Not surprising how you have to cherry pick the definition, because two other dictionaries are more general about it
>a person who takes a contrary position or attitude www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/contrarian>someone such as a writer or politician who likes to disagree with other people and express opinions that are unpopular dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/contrarian(if you can't read over a grade school level: a writer/politician is just an example. it literally doesn't mean only a politician/writer can disagree)
In most of the world, a person (in this case: 3 persons) who actually has teh figure in hand who give their view on the toy are more reliable than people who have been pretending table salt is super noticeable on a white tile, that make up doesn't work, and that literal dust specks are noticeable from a "Reasonable distance"
Again, it doesn't matter about percentage, because a dust speck is going to be a dust speck. Most of oyur figures right now have dust specks AND hair on 99% of the surface and you probably don't even notice until you get up really really close.
Just look at every collection thread we have, where people don't even bother to dust before taking the picture. Even in collections where it looks nice. If the black surface is full of dust, the toys themselves are going to be full of it too, yet look how noticeable it is.
>You know he said he got the Dasin instead right? he claimed he saw the figures in person and saw how flawed it was and everything else was, yet bought it anyway? That's a whole lotta bullshit, where he didn't think his lie through.
>How many times have we addressed this? Does it matter, because everyone who disagrees with you is samefag too. Nothing but plugging your holes because you're taking up a contrarian position on something you've never touched or seen.
Facts don't matter, you just need to argue.