>>8047477>battleship cannonslol, are you serious? you realize we went from ships that had like 80 cannons on each side to just 9, right? Most ships today have like ONE cannon now.
Again, shit like that is outdated as fuck and you're trying to make that as your argument? That's as ridiculous as giving War Machine 4 miniguns.
>doubling up or quadrupling up on big guns is something a lot of people there enjoy.Yeah, grade schoolers and maybe edgy teens from the 90s.
>Look mate, the entire run of Iron Man is an abject lesson in Technological Improbability. like i said, it's just a little nitpicking from me, hence autism. Little drums on the side of the miniguns is pretty ridiculous when that's probably just one squirt worth ammo from each gun.
But even comic books realized this, acknowledging its limitations within the issues it was used. It aided in the coolness factor too, because of how badass it sounds to use so much ammo in a second or three. But notice that they use one. Having more than one was usually only saved for mocking purposes for super edgy comics.
Shit, i understand if people like it for that cheese factor, yet people are treating this as serious business worth shitstorming over.
>I'd consider that just a factor of personal tastes,Of course, hence me thinking it's a giant waste, because I've seen better and have stated what could have been done instead. He already has 4 cut down rifles for antipersonnel and then having 4 miniguns? Re-re-re-re-re-redundant as fuck. Personally, i'd like to see different shit instead more of the same.