>>10948504>I don't take a date in the file name at face valueLook at the context then. What they're selling gives you the exact year that it was printed. ROB would be 1985 - 1988. Cabbage Patch Kids are 1980-1985. Selling Atari 2600 games are clearance prices? VG crash of 1983 till Nintendo exploded in 85 and 86. Commodore 128? 1985
Neverfuckingmind one of the ads has its date, month, day and year, printed on it.
I'm questioning if you were born in the 70s or 80s, because ads like those should be nostalgiatrips and exposing the layers of your brain year by year, remembering all the shit you saw in stores durign those times.
>too many Photoshoppers and now AI promptersAre you really making shit up just trying to save face on a fucking anonymous board? Fucking retarded
>Target and Walmart didn't really show upI don't remember Walmarts until the 90s, but Targets were plentiful. You're probaby on the east north coast. Walmarts were a southern thing and it took a while for them to expand to all of the USA. Target was midwest and same shit
>I'm perfectly confident in a $180 or $200 launch MSRP printed in my magazines and all over the internet.LOL, sounds like you FINALLY looked shit up, instead of relying on your halfassed memories of a youtube video you watched a year ago.
Pic is a magazine talking about the NEW bundle, AFTER the staggered launch, where they're doing 2 seperate bundles. Core release with just Mario and the ROB "deluxe" bundle. Lines up with what i said earlier, about my friend's dad not wanting to get the ROB version.
My memories of the 80s are great, while yours probably don't exist.
>>10948406>coping and crying to every response>probably only making a response because you want to get back at me for whatever i said decades ago>holding a grudge for how many years?>not butthurtlol
You're as bad as lying about what was going on in the 90s as you are pretending not to being buttblasted, zoomer.
