>>11461031>your example of a comic making fun of how porn-lite Marvel comics appeared to even the Marvel's own employees is wrong because the American porn-lite style from 30 years ago doesn't exactly match the porn-lite style from Japan todayOk retard
Oh, and here's a fallacy that actually applies to your retarded logic: false dichotomy. It's where retards such as yourself pretend there's only one way to describe something, because they know they're wrong, when the fact is, porn-lite has existed for a hundred thousand years in a hundred different styles ever since cavemen sculpted giant booba on their religious idols.
>ib4 comics weren't demonized in the 80s and 90s by feminists and religious right wingers who cried about the dangerously overexaggerated sexual proportions that female superheroes were givenI'm glad WW3 is starting and all the zoomers are going to be marched out to die in the war
