>>7961418>licking company boots and defending shit toys.literally did nothing of the sort, but you're proving you need to lie just to feel better about... who knows why you're so defensive about this.
Again:
Here's my original post:
>>7959504>Yes, you shouldn't need to heat up a joint to get it to move, but you still hamhanded it.Pretty simple, huh?
Stay mad, hamhands.
>>7961451>They literally have the same facial structure. But that's literally wrong.
Head's too skinny, making her look horsey, but you need to call that nitpicking, huh? Can't even talk about an artist' style and do comparisons, because you know how witchy the face is too.
>If you actually read comicshahah, suuuure, but you clearly know more than me, hence purposely avoiding using actual art from the comics the figure is based on, huh? The comic art clearly proves the figure is a failure on every level.
