>>7940348>You mean how you consider animated movies that sell more than the comics ever did to be failuresWhy are you comparing movie and comic sales? Those aren't even remotely the same thing.
>why Mattel shouldn't make toys based on something that's popular?Because it isn't popular.
>But whatever, your entire defense of Mattel's shit-tier business plan that ended in failure speaks a lot about you as well.And you're entire argument is that DC merchandise would've sold better if Mattel made figures based on direct to DVD animated movies no one gave a shit about. If Mattel made toys of those movies, it isn't going to make things like the Ryan Reynolds Green Lantern movie good.
>Both you and Mattel are failures.Says the 42 year old virgin who barks at people.
>DC has a brighter future now that Mattel isn't around to drag their characters down and make their IPs look like shit.Hopefully the 2020s lead to something better than terrible comic relaunches like the New 52, abysmal films like BvS and Justice League, and toys that are better than pic related. Oh, wait... This came out in the current year. Guess we're fucked
