>>11230470 >>11230498>NO U x100 and everything you say is a lie because i said so!All because I dared criticize a toy brand in front of rock bottom collectors who are so deluded, they can't actually defend how cheap Joytoy is. Thus: deflection, lying, and namecalling.
also
>exampling an ancient 30 year old $5 toy breaking to defend modern $160 Joytoy figures breaking and using shitty paints that modern budget children toys can do better.lol
also also, do i really need to link to our archive? Any dumbshit just needs to put "also also" (for dumbshits: with quotation marks) into the search box and click back to the oldest posts. Might as well tell me that copying and pasting the Webster dictionary defintion of a word wouldn't be proof either, despite everyone knowing how to look it up on Webster
I might just be talking to bots that can't do anything beyond generating word vomit on 4chan.
Can you even describe what's going on in this photo? Their brands and what colors that are featured on them? Obviously, a bot can't actually see the colors and won't be able to accurately identify them, hence the earlier description of "brass" despite brass and gold being so similar testing needs to be involved to accurately identify them.
>>11230484No one other than the rock bottom fanboys said they still use the chromium look. Sad, likely because that's too expensive for budget children's toys to use now, but for a $160 figure of a demi-god? ... obviously, we have a couple of retarded fanboys here who are arguing Kenner quality gold plastic from the 90s is high quality enough....
