>>7301834>>7301977>>7301838You didn't read the license, did you?
Look at the JPEG i posted and notice all that shit that's explicitally written TWICE about all the stuff that Hasbro can't make and don't have the license for, despite this license being from 2007
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/933730/000111667906001349/marvelagree.htmAgain, this is from their "master license" contract, which so many websites claim that Hasbro still has for the Marvel characters.
Master license simply means that they can produce a lot of products across multiple types of toys, which that license contract clearly proves.
You've offered no proof whatsoever to support your false claim, because you can't. Thus full of shit.
Mattel's license would be the same, hence LEGO, Mezco, Figuarts, Mafex, Play Arts, etc all making their toys in their own toy niche, same as all the companies mentioned in Hasbro's Master License for the Marvel properties.
Again, it'd be WB who is in charge of who gets what, because that's how it works for every single company as mentioned in the two books i referenced... unless you ahve proof that says otherwise?
