>>8118470> It should have been in there in the first placeExcept it is.
Sucks that you don't own McFarlane's figures to actually judge how barbell joints are great for their poseability and need to deny reality.
>>8118839Not disingenous at all, just showing off how much more he can bend over, including the neck.
I'll mark the bottom of the torso here, so you can see the angle the back is at.
I'll even show how he looks with his back straight up and down.
I even lines up his plastic skirt's seam to the SC figure's
Only person who's disengenous is that guy who doesn't seem to own Mcfarlane figures and needs to ignore the fact that I was asking for how many PoAs the SC figures have, but he's withholding that info because he knows it'll be less or the same as McFarlane's current figures.
