>>6310973>I love how you have to diminish these athlete's accomplishmentsWhy are you diminishing those who sacrificed their lives and changed the course of history by comparing them to a person who's just really good at gymnastics?
>that hard work and dedication can result in success.And according to you in
>>6310433a PR team that puts your name in the news. Sara Robles also worked hard for her weightlifting medal. Don't see Matty, let alone anyone else recognizing her hard work.
>Just black trollops, according to you. Who brought up Mae Jemison as a better role model for girls? Who brought up Simone Biles, Amy Chow, Dominique Dawes and Betty Okino who made more important inroads in gymnastics for American minorities? Me. Not you. Screaming "racist!" doesn't automatically win the argument for you anymore.
>historical figures--which the Sheroes line isn't!So Gabby, Misty, and Ava's accomplishments AREN'T historical? Well, glad that you agree with me on that. So what's your argument again? Oh yeah, that I'm a racist for wanting better role-models.
>Gabby Douglas and Misty Copeland aren't web exclusives.I haven't seen them in stores and a quick look on google shows that they're sold only at Wal-Mart & target on their web sites. Sure, maybe they're on the shelves of FAO Schwartz or some fancy doll collector store, but not on the shelves where common people can get at them.
>Barbie's Pink Label is the lowest collector label priced low ($24-30)>children who are inspired by these two athletes.So are they "adult collectibles" as most of the Barbie collector lines are labeled or are they overpriced little girl's Barbies? Can't have it both ways. If I was a mom buying my little girl a flexible Babs, a MtM Barbie is far cheaper than some "adult collectible" that's twice as expensive. And as a adult collector, wouldn't I rather have more important historical female figures instead of the latest news feed celebrity, which you agreed with me in
>>6310448