>>11300792>It isn't whataboutism>literally BUT WHAT ABOUT X AND X AND X to deflect criticism because they can't actually defend 4H>literally no counterpoint or refutation>I literally don't understand how fallacies workLOL, retard
>ib4 w-well you're using the Ad hominem fallacy!If i ONLY called you a retard, that'd be a fallacy, but i explicitly refuted your point by explaining WHAT and HOW a fallacy works.
So i hope this further example of how fallacies work helps you understand what a fallacy is, retard.
>>11300839ooof, another retard who either doesn't understand the point or is ignoring it to defend 4H's unhealthy business.
Since your IQ is too low to infer anything, that poster was referring to LARGE/EXPENSIVE products needing to crowdfunded (an apples to oranges comparison, btw, since 4H STRUGGLES to produce normal sized action figures). Toy stores have pulled waaay back on those types of products and toy companies have sought ways to release those products since the ~10s. This is part of why 1:18 was ditched and focus shifted to 1:12 by Hasbro, because mid-sized and large vehicles was a large part of their revenue.
Toy companies have had no problems at all to release normal sized action figures though. So lines like Marvel Legends grew, because retailers still supported those. Hence Hasbro's revenue also growing. But fans still want big ticket items, so they started crowd funding these items. In addition, thanks to Kickstarter's success in raising awareness(marketing) of products, they want to use the crowdfunding to show retailers that there's still demand for those types of products. This is why McFarlane did his Spawn Kickstarters, because he wanted retailers to carry his Spawn figures in stores again. And since McFarlane is actually a healthy company, they started production on their figures BEFORE getting your money.
Again, this is the opposite of 4H, because 4H is unhealthy. They can't make anything without begging
