>>7394720>Not selling 65% of their stock wasn't a problem, because they made their money back from it.No, in your own chart it explicitly says:
>OTHER OPERATING EXP./INCOMEAnd that's in the negative. Further that chart only goes up to 2016, however we started defaulting on paying people around 2018. We couldn't even afford to buy GI Joe vehicle sets for a store exclusive line in 2016, so Hasbro cancelled GI Joe entirely.
So, not being able to sell 65% of your stock is a major fucking issue.
>Again, 11 billion dollars in revenue vs 7.5 billion and they end up with 4.108 billion dollars in profits.Again, you're a moron and an autist who just doesn't want to admit their wrong on the internet.
>As their statement saysFrom 2016, of which you're cherry picking
>gigantic loanLiterally only one factor in a greater issue in the entire toy industry that you keep harping on as your entire argument, when I'm naming several key factors in why TRU went under.
>How would you even know this when you can't even understand a simple financial statement?BASED RETARD POSTER! Woah! You sure showed me with that non-answer to a serious fucking problem in your entire equation.
>A 45 year old stock boy WOAH! I guess that insult disproves all my points huh? Don't go all Chris-Chan on us now!
