>>9845074>The mon's may be nearly as good>Gen 2 looks great tooReally though? Come on now don't be silly
>>9845081>Gen 1 to 210/10 to 4/10
>Gen 5 to 64/10 to 3/10
Not saying the gen 2 dex is the worst designed ever(that's 8 obviously), just the most jarring fall from grace