>>7620655I'm on a Mac, but like i said, it's a common toy you could have found at Barnes and Noble a couple of months ago. The little dots are a texture you can see at any distance.
Again, it's literally just a low res newspaper quality print. As opposed to magazine prints or any modern cellphone screen where any mong can notice a difference in resolution from the 00s to 10s, despite the pixel density being much higher than this shit.
