>>>7744601 I'm using a fucking HP workstation monitor people use for professional work.Must be pretty shit if you can't tell what's going on in those photos then or you're just lying.
And you're certainly proven youre not above needing to lie, considering you're a bad contrarian and making false equivocations about paint jobs when it comes to liking complex paint apps except in action figures because NECA did a bad job on some random figure.
>there are no highlights on that foot.See? Either you're lying or your computer monitor is completely shit, because there's a white highlight on nearly every edge of those Warhammer figures.
I'm beginning to think you're lying about painting models now since oyu don't realize those are highlights.
No wonder you thought they were simply painted.
No doubt it's why you avoided answering what speakers you dad and brother had, because you're lying there too and don't want to step deeper into your mushy shit ground of lies.
You really pile up your bullshit so high you're about to drown in it.
>>>7744626 muh opinion on technology matters on your horrible monitor that can see details mine can't because yours is old and thus baadhue
BTW, i did mention i have a mac from 2017? Pretty sure i did. i can compare and contrast shit really well, because i actually own everything I'm talking about. Also, like i said, my oldass 2000 monitor can see that shit too. They must be great monitors if your newer "professional" chinese shit is muddling those details. And they all still work almost like they're brand new.
And all this bullshit I responded to? Just to defend Bandai's cheapass Mattel quality paint jobs, by pretending Warhammer 40k isn't always shown complexly painted by GWS thus Bandai doesn't need to try on their $40+ figure.
>ib4 unpainted GWS sprues or boardgame shit>>7744625Yes, that is from when Bandai was using 3-5 masking tools to paint their haces; before switching to a cheaper to do one step low res sticker.
