>>11559876Again, you're ignoring the fact that robots are able to make robots. They've been making cars for at least 50 years now, except now they can do more complex tasks, thanks to computers being more advanced and now AI is stepping up to fill in the more difficult shit.
Again, you'er ignoring the fact that technology never gets worse and continues improving year after year.
So again, where are the millions of workers doing warehouse work, dock work, programming, editing, burgers, etc going to go? Again, your failed analogy was a failure, because automobilies only increased the amount of workers needed worldwide. AI/robots only decreases the amount needed.
>So we do things the good old fashioned way, eh?Why not?
What's wrong with going back to the 70s/80s/90s approach, before production started packed away to be started overseas?
Cost of goods actually went up back then, because companies said that creating the factories overseas and in other countries cost them a ton of money... but that was a short term thing, despite the cost of production going waaay down and prices never went down with them. So companies made mad profit from overseas production and consumers were actually negatively affected by it, instead of ever seeing any benefits.
Companies got richer and the trickle effect wasn't real, dude. Yet you're trying to say that AI/robots ramifications won't be real?
You'er a fucking retard, made more obvious how you're trying to insert your black and white politics into this.
Do you even work? Because something tells me either you're megarich or superpoor, so you won't be affected by society crumbling from the loss of jobs.
