>>9178101>>It went fromholy fuck, what's wrong with you?
Hasbro upset = Hasbro can't change the stories, to do their own thing because people like Hama's GI Joe
Can't deny Hama has most input = you people denying Hama made almost every single character that people want to continue to see
you think writers don't matter = you guys denying that a writer has the most control over the characters
There is no changing anything, this is all just in response to you guys clearly not understanding how GI Joe was made, nor its history. Everything i said is to explain to you guys how it is Hama's GI Joe.
>>9178101>cartoon was full on snake man from the HimalayasDon't be stupid. This was a retcon and why so many people hated the animated movie. There's no way this was a popular idea, given how fast that shit was DROPPED. Like the live action movies, all their elements are written out. The Dic cartoon had that one two parter and it was back to normal. Even the bioweapons that cobra used later was based on "evil science" not the natural shit Cobra-la had.
>Why do you make shit up? LOL, why are YOU? Let's see some sources on the actors not wanting to work with another director. Anything to support to cartoon was a snake man before movie? How about the claim Jim Shooter invented Cobra and Cobra Commander? How are you going to deny Hama had nothing to do with the cartoon despite being credited for the characters? Or Marvel was just a licensee and had no hand in modern Joe? That Hama only just invented the words and why he shouldnt be credited for the characters? No examples of cartoon/toy villains either, eh?
>Biggest complaint was the looksLOL. BOOOOL shit. Look at the reviews, the actors hates, and all the bitching about CC being part of the military or Baroness being brainwashed Duke's GF. You clearly weren't part of ANY forum back when the first movie came out, muchless /toy/. Or is this just more of your bullshit to deny Hama's role in the franchise?
