>>5904696> 90s toys weren't shit in the 90s. No shit?
It's a good thing i said what i said in 2016, instead of traveling back in time where i wouldn't waste time on AOL's 4chan chat room talking about toys and instead fuck your hot younger mom.
>because they are just made to ape the original toys and be retro for the sake of being retro.... so they're not good for being exact replicas, yet the originals are good...
Can you say anything that isn't hypocritical as fuck?
>What did you really think would happen.Same shit that happens when mocking 90s clothes?
It can be a laugh riot, but i guess nostalgiafags ilke yourself can't see past your own nose and think everyone should only have hte same view as yourself.
>call everything that came before garbageWell, for a lot of things, this isn't true, because some things don't age into rotten bananas like most of the crap in the catalog.
