>>8032061>muh theory that 2+2=5 is right and ill argue to the death that its right despite no evidence of it>i will deny that everything that doesn't fit my theory>every toy from 2004-2012 was this shitty. the toy buyers simply did not know better.huheuhuehueh sure is retard that is making shit up and denying reality.
Also, you're proving how much of a newfag you are, since /toy/ had been bitching about how archaic mattel's shit looked since /toy/ existed.
why would a company like mattel produce toys for two decades and pay upwards of 4 billion dollars for the license+royalties during this time if it wasn't successfull? Do you even business 101, professor third worlder?
clearly only its last few years weren't a success, which is why they didn't bother to reup a license that's worth half a billion dollars or more.
>more denials and bullshit keep on believing this shit is quality just because it was popular
>but not when it contradicts my argument!!!!!!!no shit?
