>>9711550>StyleNah. That's just you making an excuse for McFarlane's dogshit paint, which is usually rough and lumpy and poorly applied. His 40K line is probably only as good as it is because he holds back on the paint (which is fine by me as half the appeal is the "paint your own" angle). 40K can get away with sloppier paint, but acting like it's an intentional choice and not just shonky paint quality is delusion.
Compare it to the actual quality paint on the Bandai Marine with its nice airbrushed shading.
>Overly detailedMore detail isn't automatically better. Again, seems like the company is too cheap to invest in proper finishing techniques to get a smooth result so he lets everything have an orange-peel finish and pretends it's on purpose.
>Yeah, i would say that McFarlane's scale is too big, because a Dreadnought would be fuckhuge and i wouldn't be able to army build those.Imagine being so low-T that you don't want a Dreadnought the size of a small CRT TV.
>Hopefully McFarlane continues with his non-scale WH40k system and just makes a 7" Dreadnought. Nah, that'd be stupid.
>That would actually be roughly 1:18 scale and would actually be more to scale than JoyRide's stuff so far.It'd also be worse painted and less articulated, so fuck that.
