>>8278372>You said him calling a figure great is low standards.IS English not your first language?
I didn't say
>Because you some really low standardsI said "thems", referring to MULTIPLE instances of rating something highly when the quality of content itself is LOW.
Even if you don't understand colloquialisms, if you understand proper ENGLISH GRAMMAR and finished 9th grade English, you should be able to infer that that sentence was in support to my previous one stating
>IS this sort positivity like how gaming review places can only rate games from a scale of 7-9?Why are you such a high school drop out?
Or did you finish HS, but only the retard equivalent?
>>8278378If they decided to make their own shit, why even get the license for a specific game? Go look at Yamaguchi's ugly shit. He's not putting any specific logos or even claiming they're based on specific comics.
You do realize that they're actually paying MORE for that license for that specific game, because it's current, right? A generic license costs less.
