>>5393643Too small relative to what? Are you holding out for Toyworld's line or did you actually think Hasbro was going to deliver on a quality product? I guess you could always wait for some MP contructicons.
>>5394169Notice how I said "smaller" and not "shorter". So technically the only place I was wrong was wrongly saying t that GT's devastator isn't actually seemingly bulkier than Toyworld's. TW's not devastator looks pretty lanky. So on an absolutely technical level I am perfectly within my right to misspeak about hight/mass differentials.
Also, you usage of the wrong "your" is baffling. Kill yourself.
Also, "lrn2english" is a niggerism of the highest degree. Don't expose that garbage in my thread, on my board, on my site and using my internet.
See? I can be picky and autistic too.
