>>8825488 (checked)>For all that people complain about “fat” Barbie, she at least looks like an actual body type and isn’t an affront to one’s eyes.This.
I'm -very- new to this scene, having started looking at fashion/1:6/barbie stuff the other day due to a getting a stupid idea in my head for a project and blowing some cash on some doll stuff. And now I want to go full-retard in this hobby because holy shit you can get loads of cool miniature stuff for this line for cheap.
Anyway, while looking at doll bits, I came across the "curvy" barbie, namely the "made to move" yoga variant. To my eyes, I thought it looked good. Chubby, but not full-blown "fat", nice ass, too.
Then I went and did a web search. People fucking hate this thing. Which is a bit of a shame, because at least for the MtM version, it's a hell of a figure for the price. Fully articulated doll, a detailed head with light brown hair and eyes, a set of clothes, a set of thighs that a guy can lose his mind in. I short, a pretty doll.
I think the big problem is they called it "Barbie", when they should have given it a new name and made it one of Barbie's friends.
>"Hey kids, meet Barbie's new friend: "Milly the Milf"!""Barbie" is a character, a person. And a part of that character is her build; Flat stomach, flat ass, tiny waist, thin arms, thin, well-defined cheekbones and jaw, the blonde hair and bright blue eyes of course. It's one thing to change her clothes and her profession, but changing -her- I can see upsetting people.
Anyhow, God help me, but I'm probably going to buy one.
