>>6793564Please. All I'll get from you is "NOT GOOD ENOUGH!!!!!"
Again, i thought the sculpts are fine. They're not great like you see with pretty much every figure out there, but that doesn't mean they don't have his likeness right.
Again, almost every movie out there has the actors signing shit so that their face can be plastered onto everything.
No modern action movie won't have that stipulated into their contracts, unless the actor has a lot of pull to get the contract down however they want. Someone like RDJr had so much pull that he was able to get the rest of the Avengers better contracts (monetary value as far as we know), yet he still shills products and has his face plastered onto everything (and he probably gets more money from that too)
I'd like to see proof that is contrary to what we know is a standard clause in nearly every action movie contract.
I know that /toy/ used to believe that likeness rights were seperate, but only because most of what we hear is from NECA trying to get rights from 80s and 70s movies before nearly every movie started getting a toyline and making actors sign away their face for use in cereal boxes and novelty soaps.
