>>10431318>LOL i'm ignorant and don't realize there's a fallacy named after what I'm trying to do https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_ridicule LOL!retard
>"I never saw it" =\= it doesn't exist.Not at all what i said.
I said that you guys love to shout out dissent and negative remarks, hence making posts to drown out those types of posts, so they're not visible by someone just browsing the board (only OP and the last 4 posts are visible when browsing)
>way to ignore You mean you justifying how Joytoy is allowed to fuck up the scale and move discussion away from Joytoy fucking up the scale to say how all other brands are worse?
Again, you're proving my point that you just want to deflect criticism and drown out discussion if it's negative about Joytoy.
nevermind i already addressed the issue on scale here
>>10429880 and my following post
pic is how Joytoy words the description of their toys vaguely despite claiming their toys are 1:18
