>>6654237No clue. I don't think Lone Ranger sold very well, there isn't too much demand right now. We can always hope.
>>6654286>doubt>>6654423TLG is definitely aware of the push for more old-school style space stuff, don't get me wrong. From what I've heard, there is a bit of a risk in making a really "old-school" type of theme in the modern era, especially with how every theme now has a TV series tie in, or app, or whatever. The best hope for sets like this in the near future before Star Wars fatigue kicks in would be a small City subtheme again focusing on lunar stuff.
Also the 40th anniversary of classic space is coming up really soon...
>>6654077I haven't *heard* anything about that yet? Like it's possible, man, but I think LEGO is trying to keep the UCS line for large-scale starships instead of "scenes" because of how badly Assault on Hoth did.
