>>7242250>your hypocrisy is showingSays the hypocrite that pretends cut lines are utterly retarded anatomical nonsense while praising giant gaps and needs to misconstrues what I've said to pretend to have a point. In another thread, or maybe this one, i specifically exampled DCC's movie figure that was basically a Figuarts-clone to show how overpriced Japanese figures are, because they only cost about $35 and also use more paint (inb4 you wrongfully say DCC used the more expensive Lexan plastic in the past 4 years to say they still break).
>Your lack of self awareness is astonishing.but that's also wrong.
>>7232377You just continue to bullshit and try to make it out to be a brand war. Only reason Hasbro is brought up is because this is a thread about Hasbro's toys and the only reason REvoltech was brought up was to talk about how two ball-hinges act. Which exploded because you and others got butthurt because it was pointed out it doesn't work that well and not everyone likes Yamaguchi's way of engineering toys, which is like cutting apart an Amiibo figure to give it joints
>At the cost...Holy shit, are you brain damaged? Again, the Overwatch figure uses a ball joint at the upper torso. There is no need for a swivel
>You defend MLs and discount toys that are better I just buy whatever looks good. Hasbro has more accurate sculpts than most other companies, so guess what? Even if their articulation or mobility isn't that great, they're still very poseable figures and look good.
You and others have a HUUUUUGE problem with this apparently, and always need to pretend it's about brandwars, because all you do is project your petty views onto others. This is why you keep ignoring the fact i also buy Japanese lines that do look great too.
Apparently it's impossible for you to understand anyone outside yourself, because you might be brain damaged, hence you keep on forgetting this topic is about a figure that has no waist swivel, but instead a ball jointed torso.
