>>8027249>still making up analogies because logic behind argument that popularity is a HUUUUUUUUEG indicator of quality is so shittyjust delete your earlier post and pretend I'm arguing with nobody.... oh wait, LOL! you can't delete shit that old and now you need to desperately scramble to somehow discount McFarlane Toys from your "logic" without looking like a pathetic hypocritical child who doesn't understand his own words and has no forethought at all!