>>9079173Yes. I've put up with a lot already, but there's no excuse for this drop in quality. Other than one of the big Creator sets that are from classic themes, which is about one set per year or a Ninjago set here or there, I'm out for now until quality comes back. Lego is going to need to fall on their butt financially before that happens though I'm afraid.
>>9080469>"it's just one set!" they said back with Big Bang TheoryAs expected, it's not going to stop. What's the point of this beyond making some political statement? I'm so sick of fags calling attention to themselves and getting near children.
>>9081548Yup, add getting political onto the list of reasons why I'm dropping Lego also. I'm sick of the culture war itself and EVERYTHING becoming a battlefield for it.
>>9081782Very nice!
>>9082332>hardly even looks like Lego with this much SNOT appliedMeh, at that point, you might as well buy an actual vintage typewriter to display and even use if you want. I guess it's neat that you CAN make a model like that, but they've jumped the shark about what Lego is. This reeks of some AFOL going "B-but it's not a children's toy, look!" to me.
