>>5853435>It's not a buzzword when it directly applies to you.Sure, you go on believing that.
>yet you think that the metals toy companies use are the same ones they use for automobiles.I never said that at any point you lying, strawmanning mongoloid.
>In reality, it's cheapo shit metals that are chosen specifically for being cheap to produce, including being low melting points,So according to you, more expensive = bad and cheaper = good...except when a company you don't like does it.
I've already explained to you why diecast is used and why it doesn't NEED to be automotive quality. Even really cheap metal is a million times better than most plastic. I'm not going over it again.
>For paint thickness, the proof is in EVERYTHING made from diecast. You can see it with your naked eye.That's bollocks and you know it. I love how you can't even give an actual example of a collector's grade diecast toy having meaningful detail blurred out by paint.
Fun fact: I paint models, including metal ones. Guess what? Plastic and metal models, once painted, look EXACTLY THE FUCKING SAME.
>As for the wire reasons, that's a nice strawman you're building.You're the one strawmanning (and really badly at that). I never said that plastic stands were "invisible" only that they were more pleasing than a crooked metal wire.
>You ignore all the actual reasons why metal wire is superior to plastic standsWhich is the reason that bendy wire stands are used for Figmas, Revoltechs, Figuarts and other collector's grade figures OH WAIT
>(oh ho ho, do you not see humor in this?)I do see the humour in you pitifully attempting to justify your rampant poorfaggotry.
>and instead pretend that I only think it's good because it's cheap.I don't need to pretend that. It's true- you're too poor or too stupid to acquire proper stands so you try and make up delusional reasons why crappy wire stands are better than a proper articulated one.
You're fucking hilarious Subjectanon, but please, fuck off.
