>>11249465(cont) If you look at picrel, it becomes clear; revenues are declining, and they're just loaning money to keep the party going because oh boy does Cocks love his bonusses.
So will Elon be a good choice? Well, what are the alternatives?
>Hasbro dies, IP's go in limbo>Hasbro sells/licenses IP's off to tards who will make an ever bigger mess>Off chance good people get the IP's and aren't absolute fucktards about it.Elon is an interesting person and has his flaws, but at least he seems to care about the state of D&D; he ain't the only tech billionaire or investor who cares. there are enough rich fucks that love D&D (remember the Altafox debacle?), love Transformers... and Gabe Newell is (or was) a horsefucker. Elon Musk just wants to sell product for profit and not insert it with political garbage or appease the monstrous egos of the low-IQ Hasbro boomer managers that roam the company and ensure its continued decline.
Elon *knows* all these IPs are undervalued because Hasbro made a mess off them, and not because they're actually bad brands; they're not, just mismanaged. For decades, only now just ''worse than 10 years ago''. He knows he can make a buttload of profits if he makes good stuff out of them. And actually have competent writers make the stories for the shows, movies, videogames, whatever. When he bought Twatter he removed all the clowns and the site runs perfectly fine, no matter what the clowns in the media or /leftypol/ say.
So yeah, Elon Musk might be the best hope /toy/, /tg/ and /horse/ might have. Not the ideal candidate, but the best candidate.
