>>11181265>oldass characters from an unpopular 80s cartoon that most people thought was stupid as fuck.>my niche thing is better than other people's niche thingHoly fucking confirmed stupid.
People do like the movie, the cartoon, people all like this stuff. You don't like it. Each one has fans and following. They made toys YOU don't like. Again, this doesn't have broad appeal. It's not dinosaur or car toys, it is a niche thing. You think if they made toys you like they'd have succeeded? Or are you just made they didn't make toys you want?
>What people want are D&D monsters and cool popular characters that sold millions of book and games. Oh wait, they fucking did do that, fucking pic related, you dumbass.
>That's fine, but I'm just pointing out how there's so much pent up demand tThere clearly isn't. 4h succeeds without the D&D brand and hasbro couldn't succeed with the D&D brand. Case and point
>>11182041Sorry the thing you like isn't liked by everyone. D&D was always an underground thing and is reaching broad appeal and mass success, but not in toys. Hasbro will try again, they own it outright now.
