>>7928265>But here's an older figure using the old engineering and doing it better than the Figuarts from back then.The Iron Man on the far right from Bendis' Invincible Iron Man was released literally a year ago. Almost exactly, it was one of the first ML waves of last year. Now take a look at another Iron Man from last year. THAT is how the pose is properly done. The ones you pictures, newest one and all, do it like complete shit.
>Shock and awe the poseability varies depending on the sculpt. Some figures won't do it as good as others, but again, the differences aren't drastic.Pretty drastic compared to pic related. Especially considering the right most figure came out the same year this AY did.
>You don't see me nitpicking Harley's elbows, do you?You are literally right now and we're earlier with your "cut up statue" bullshit.
>I'm not even nitpicking about the PAK quality knees that is obvious from nearly EVERY angle, because that's a HUGE gaping disjointed looking gap. It's not hidden anywhere, it's right up FRONT because it's lazy engineering. Are you really comparing AY knees to PAKs peanut knees? Do you have eyes? Have you ever handled these figures?
>I personally think the floating disjointed gapey ugliness is too horrible to ever buy the figures of, hence my distaste toward Yamaguchi's lazyass Transformer inspired engineering.So do you prefer ML style knees on figures like Gwenppol or the Stepford Cuckoo's? Should their bare legs look like they have knee pads on
>>7927838?
>I don't expect a figure to be perfect.So you'll let McFarlane slide but nitpick AY, SHF and any other Japanese brand to death? Ok.
Please post a Hasbro or McFarlane figure doing the super hero landing as good as this one.
