>>7827827I didn't jump on you. Just clarifying their price, because you didn't seem to know their price either. We just knew that they're too expensive for what they are.
>Why is it you make this argument all the time, only to get proven wrong by someone posting proof they did buy whatever it is you're arguing about?You mean that one guy who posted his picture? That sure is a lot of a single person. It's almost like i said very few people actually bought them vs the amount of people who defend that shit, which I've mentioned at least two other times within this thread.
Also, i really like how you mention that Bulma thing, especially after i pointedly said i wasn't going to force her joints to do it (articulation is blocked by the clothes), but you're proving you always need to ignore shit and move your goal posts to pretend to have any point at all.
Whereas my point is pretty singular
>>>7823474 There were threads about them constantly back when they were new, but not a lot of people actually bought them and most seemed to have bought them only when they were going on clearance at Barnes and Noble.Again, you're one of those people who only bought them when they got clearanced out. I'm right and you desperately need to move your goal posts, just to continue this tired argument.
