>>11248070>ignores the fact that comics don't look like cheap glossy plastic toys like Hasbro, Figuarts, and Mafex appear>argues that it's okay for them to look like cheap glossy plastic toys because needs to take up contrarian stanceThat's nice that you needed to create new goalpost, but can you ignore your original argument any harder?
>Those are anime/comic characters, it would make no sense for them to have full extensive paintjobsYou're so sad that you don't even know what the comics look like.
I mean, even if you want to say that Bandai's figures (completely ignoring Gwenpool) are based on the anime, the anime still doesn't look like cheapo glossy colored plastic look
Imagine if Bandai or Medicom spent the extra dime to have as many paint apps as Toy Biz or McFarlane did in the 00s. You wouldn't be spooging over having something that looked like it was straight out of one of the covers, which McFarlane and DCD managed to do for almost a decade?
I mean, i know why you need to take up your contrarian stance
(because you're absolutely butthurt over me) in your posts, but i never see anyone ask for high quality paint jobs anywhere. Are people's standards really so low they can't even fantasize about high end paint on toys?
