>>7242319>I've explained my point multiple times and you're just ignoringNah, I'm pretty sure I read you correctly
>Yamaguchi's engineering allows for really dynamic poses at the cost of some sculpt integrity.>Hasbro's waist swivels make the figure look like absolute trash if you use it Basically
>When Revoletch cuts away the sculpt to make the toy look hollow and has negative molding showing, it's great. >When Hasbro cuts the sculpt, it's utterly retarded anatomical nonsenseDelicious cognitive dissonance from a hypocrite.
> it's a thread about Overwatch/Blizzard toys LOL, WUT? The fucking thread title infers it's about Hasbro and contains Hasbro's figure, complete with the Hasbro logo in OP.
Can you take a screenshot of the reality you're living in?
>An upper torso balljoint alone isn't enoughProve it.
>It works perfectly well.I've posted three videos proving it doesn't. Here's ANOTHER showing how armor limits the ball joint on an armored figure
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kM7rMrSqWcQ>A toy that compromises on articulation for "muh sculpt" is pointless.Such extremism, but i guess your brain damage affected the rational part of your brain and this is also why you think you live in another reality that this isn't about a Hasbro figure and a Hasbro toyline.
>Why do you have to keep lying?Again, please post a screenshot of the reality your living in. Show me where the swivel is, because it's clearly a ball joint just like Hasbro has been using on their females.
