>>10308957most people on /toy/ can't even afford buying toys, hence the BST full of people selling their flavors of the month to buy the next flavor of the month and fanboys needing to believe their brand is the bestest ever, because there's no way they spent all their money on inferior or even "good" toys.
They can't sell their Detolf tomorrow, so it's a "major investment"
There there's all the relativism. I buy $80-$400+ artbooks (sometimes of unknowns) where I'll think "whoa, that's cheap" and i'll realistically spend 30 minutes looking through it, yet will balk at spending $10 toy that i could spend dozens of hours playing with the rest of my collection.
Weird shit, but I like art more than i do toys.
Same way someone likes toys more than some furniture. This is why a lot of people here just have shit piled into their shelves, because they don't care about the actual asthetics, just the sense of ownership of that toy.
>>10300803depending on the lighting, it's almost impossible to even see toys from another angle, especially when they have another glass case next to it.
Reflections are a giant bitch.
Museums take care to avoid this problem.
