>>9235410Here's a creative exercise for you then. Take a small $5-20 set from like 10-20 years ago that you fucking love a lot, and try rebuilding it with a modern parts pool, a different color palette, in a different size (be it larger or smaller), and so on while still keeping the same general profile/design elements of the original set. Experiment by trying to redesign familiar elements with newer parts. Basically do what
>>9229783 did with
>>9229775 or what pic related did with set #497
Actually, set rebuilds might be a fun theme for next month.
