>>7532501I'm not going to lie
I've post my figures and you've seen my pile of toys where Hiya toys are just tossed in there, because they're not fragile. See also the mcfarlanes.
Again, you don't know shit about any of these toys and are only speaking from ignorance.
>Which should never compromise articulation unless absolutely necessaryYour bias is showing. You're ignoring the vast majority of the collector industry to fit your very narrow view.
Again, the distinguishing factor in 99% of collector toys has been their higher end paint/sculpt. The collector industry started this way, having fewer joints than even Kenner crap and to this day, the vast majority of the collector industry isn't how you view it.
>He says as he defends Hasbro.I'm talking about the Hot Toys and other higher end collector lines in this scale, but what do you know? Apparently nothing, because you're only speaking from a point of ignorance.
And it is quantifiable, because that shit is expensive. All those paint apps you see on all these figures adds up, hence why collector toys are more expensive. Seeing a company cheap out, especially collector companies in the use of those low res prints is disappointing, because not only is it low res, it sometimes substitutes a paint app that was superior like airbrushing shadows or a tampograph.
>Without MicromanIgnoring the point, which is that they look chintzy and cheap, despite being more poseable than most everyline out there. I personally like Microman, but they get awfully bad looking... like Yamaguchi's stuff, except not because of the style.
>Says the man who thinks anything more expensive than an ML is "overpriced" (It's being objective. And my collection is larger than yours, more varied, and i own more expensive stuff than you. I don't need to lie to feel better about my wasting that much more money on figures i like.
And to equate Mattel's halfassed efforts to Hasbro's is just more of your nutter bias.
