>>9989598>respond to me talking about sculpt not needing to be sacrified since early 00s>want ot argue about something else because have no pointSo how about that weather? IT was hot today, but since you're such a contrarian, are you going to tell me that I'm wrong to consider it hot because there was an earthquake yesterday? Or tell me I'm ignorant about it being hot, because the ducks are the ones creating the heat?
>how would YOU achieve the same level of articulation whilst achieving more fluid sculpt?Lotta companies have been doing a great job at articulation and posing without a billion cuts since the early 00s. Even the ball jointed pieces on Toy Biz's MLs are less intrusive and busy looking than the new Figuart joints.
>Wasn't that line brickish even by 1:18 standards of the time?No. They were ahead of the game back then. Superior to MU and GI Joes. GI Joes leaped frog em later and then MU figures basically became mini MLs.
>The only toyline which even HAD notable articulation back thenwtf dude. It's a fucking analogy. How fucking retarded are you to take this so literal?
I'm saying you're justifying shitty sculpts that ahve no business existing since the late 90s.
>you can't readI can read just fine, but I'm not going to argue with your made up fantasies about how manufacturing works.
