>>10555705This is a near-perfect example of John Byrne's heroic proportions chart, it's a beautiful thing to behold. McFarlane usually does a real nice job with the proportions.
Which again, is not me saying he is incapable of wrong, or the best toymaker, or anything like that. I'm just giving credit where credit is due, since some people like
>>10554769 seem to see no value in this line whatsoever.
