>new threadCollection posting time.
>>11043334>Yea seeing builds like that make me feel like they missed the point entirely.Disagree about them missing the point. The GWP was clearly meant to be a nostalgia-grab for people who grew up with it rather than directly appeal to a new generation of kids. I don't think LEgo would have locked it behind a $100 paywall or put an age rating of 18+ on the box otherwise.
>>11044453Based. I was considering watching the movies the other weekend out of curiosity/boredom but decided against it. I can't imagine direct-to-DVD movies pushing a children's toy line are going to age super well.
