>>6011439>That's a lie.>>6011487>>6011526I've seen them posted at least twice before and I remember the first time I saw them was with info being posted about their names as new additions to the line. People asked questions about them but then interest fell to the wayside. Since then they've been posted again and again, to the point that someone actually had to ask why they were being posted if they had been posted before. It's the same with that stupid Disney doll post that keeps getting posted at the beginning of the thread every time. 2016 Disney dolls? It's fucking November, show me leaks of 2017 releases if you have them. The point is we know they exist. They have been posted before. Instead of being defensive, admit that they have been posted before and that you posted them without any real context.
