Sorry for the delay, but here's your next Groupbuild theme! A full write-up will be posted tomorrow
>>10570385The tl;dr is that for the first hour of the poll being up I forgot to enable the option to limit people to one reply, so you could vote multiple times for the same theme. A dumb oversight on my end, but even dumber when someone straight-up said that they stuffed the votes in that first hour in favor of the theme that had won in the original poll (Which may or may not have just been shitposting for all I know).
>>10570874If I didn't want a theme to win then why would I even put it as an option for people to vote on? There's several themes that get rejected whenever the discussion of the new theme comes up, but it's usually super-narrow themes (ie: Circus theme) or themes that just require too much of a time/monetary investment for people to compete in.(ie: anything that'd require a shit-ton of kitbashing to even be close to related to the theme of the groupbuild).
