>>11241341Whatever.
You are a liar and have done nothing but attempt to damage control the situation since it was posted. You still haven't been able to post one iota of proof that the FTC rule isn't applicable to this situation.
They have violated consumer law.
They have further damaged their already tarnished reputation.
Their warehouse logistics is a shambles.
Their computer system is a shambles.
>>11241346>However will they recover from thaaaat?Maybe they can threaten to ban anyone that posts mean comments or laughs at their ineptitude from buying from their store.
Sorry, I meant to say that mean comments and laughter "may result in limited opportunities to buy future products from the NECA store."
Yeah. That should cover them legally. It's not a threat to blacklist people if we phrase it vaguely like that.
