>>8986267>one is a passive experience and one is an active experienceMan you're copium is off the charts, the experience in this case is is pointless, both consume ones time in the same way, one a screen and the issue is 25 million dollars for a half hour taken away they could just be playing the game is a solid risk, meanwhile until the last two years a movie required you to go to a special setting with the goal of socializing compared to a tv show which was in the comfort of your own home.
>A cartoon along side a movie is redundant a video game is not.it is if all you care about is money on that one screen they are on
>Let me restateWhy not just be honest with yourself: like anon said you are just whiny they didn't do what you wanted and now are just doing mental gymnastics to justify why they should have done your very specific thing when we have had countless more failures with video game animated properties than we have had success.
>How did they not get the show off the ground, when marketing/merchandise were in full blitzAnd now you are just clowning yourself, that is still the same answer given, it's a huge risk of just wasting money with no clear indicator it improves profits.
