>>7152326Like I said, I was embarrassed to admit I did not know of the current McFarlane figures that
>>7152058 mentioned having the forward facing pin in hip articulation. I am already aware that most McFarlane articulation has the T-Hip style, and no where was it implied I did not know that. So this is hilarious that you yourself try to put me down, after I already admitted a fault in my knowledge by trying to one up me with the same lack of knowledge on the subject.
Because you see, I finally found the hips that
>>7152058 mentioned
>>7152058Now that I know what you are talking about, I am FLABBERGASTED McFarlane put the go ahead for that style of hips on WALKING DEAD of all figures. I almost wonder if this was his way of throwing his hands in the air and screaming 'FINE! You want articulation!? HERE'S YOUR WISH!'
>>7152307I am aware that this person doing the interview will most likely bring in complaints as well, and I truly apologize, but this interview is very good in my opnion regarding how outdated McFarlane is in his views on articulation. Love the man for his sculpt work, but man he can be very narrow minded to the rest of the toy industry.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntn7bgbl4wUHow are those lines I mentioned not McStatues. The Titanfall certianly are, A few of the recent walking Dead are not, but the main ones seem to be, and Gears of War definitely are.
Unless you feel having a pair of limbs with 'full' articulation while the other limbs either have none or bare basic swivels to help them fit in the box better as being enough articulation to bot be called McStatues. Well if that true then the issue in all this arguing is that you are adhering to a different standard of what is and isn't a McStatue then the rest of the thread. For that I apologize for not fully grasping the situation.
